According to CNN, the Pentagon is
"to establish regional teams of military personnel
to assist civilian authorities in the event of a
significant outbreak of the H1N1 virus this fall,
according to Defense Department officials."
"The proposal is awaiting final
approval from Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
The officials would not be
identified because the proposal from U.S.
Northern Command's Gen. Victor Renuart has not
been approved by the secretary.
The plan calls for military
task forces to work in conjunction with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency. There is no
final decision on how the military effort would
be manned, but one source said it would likely
include personnel from all branches of the
military.
It has yet to be determined how
many troops would be needed and whether they
would come from the active duty or the National
Guard and Reserve forces.
Civilian authorities would lead
any relief efforts in the event of a major
outbreak, the official said. The military, as
they would for a natural disaster or other
significant emergency situation, could provide
support and fulfill any tasks that civilian
authorities could not, such as air transport or
testing of large numbers of viral samples from
infected patients.
As a first step, Gates is being
asked to sign a so-called "execution order" that
would authorize the military to begin to conduct
the detailed planning to execute the proposed
plan.
Orders to deploy actual
forces would be reviewed later, depending on how
much of a health threat the flu poses this
fall, the officials said." (CNN,
Military planning for possible H1N1
outbreak, July 2009, emphasis added)
The implications are
far-reaching.
The decision points towards
the militarization of civilian institutions,
including law enforcement and public
health.
A nationwide vaccination
program is already planned for the Fall.
The pharmaceutical industry is slated to
deliver 160 million vaccine doses by the Fall,
enough doses to vaccinate more than half of
America's population.
The Pentagon is
already planning on the number of troops to be
deployed,. with a view to supporting a mass
vaccinaiton program.
It is worth noting
that this involvement of the military is not being
decided by the President, but by the Secretary of
Defense, which suggests that the Pentagon is, in a
key issue of of national interest, overriding
the President and Commander in Chief. The US
Congress has not been consulted on
the issue.
This decision to
mobilise the Armed Forces in the vaccination
campaign is taken in anticipation of a
national emergency. Although no national
emergency has been called, the presumption is that
a national public health emergency will occur,
using the WHO Level 6 Pandemic as a pretext and a
justification.
Other countries, including
Canada, the UK and France may follow suit, calling
upon their Armed Forces to play a role in support
of the H1N1 vaccination program.
US Northern
Command
Much of the groundwork for
the intervention of the military has already been
established. There are indications that these
"regional teams" have already been established
under USNORTHCOM, which has been involved in
preparedness training and planning in the case of
a flu pandemic (See U.S.
Northern Command - Avian Flu. USNORTHCOM
website).
Within the broader
framework of "Disaster Relief", Northern Command
has, in the course of the last two years, defined
a mandate in the eventuality of a public health
emergency or a flu pandemic. The emphasis is on
the militarization of public health whereby
NORTHCOM would oversee the activities of civilian
institutions involved in health related services.
“Also, the United States
in 1918 had the Spanish influenza. We were the
ones who had the largest response to [a
pandemic] in more recent history. So I discussed
what we did then, what we expect to have happen
now and the numbers that we would expect in a
pandemic influenza.”
The potential number of
fatalities in the United States in a modern
pandemic influenza could reach nearly two
million, according to Felderman. Not only would
the nation’s economy suffer, but the Department
of Defense would still have to be ready and able
to protect and defend the country and provide
support of civil authorities in disaster
situations. While virtually every aspect of
society would be affected, “the implications for
Northern Command will be very significant.”
“[A pandemic would have] a huge
economic impact, in addition to the
defense-of-our-nation impact,” Felderman said.
The United States isn’t alone in preparing for
such a potential catastrophe. (Gail Braymen, op
cit)
Apart from the CNN dispatch and a
FOX news report, there has been virtually no
mainstream press coverage of this issue. No
statement has been made by USNORTHCOM. The
Fox New Report suggests that US troops would
be involved in organising military quarantines
(see videoclip below).
See also: Fox News Report
We
invite our readers to review Global Research's
News Highlight Dossier: H1N1
Swine Flu Pandemic Dossier. The latter
contains a collection of articles and analytical
reports.
The US
military has for some years been involved
in Influenza Surveillance, in collaboration
with partner Armed Forces in different countries.
The Pentagon is also in liason with the
Atlanta based CDC. The US military is actively
involved in laboratory based activities
internationally with partner Armed Forces. The
following report is of particular relevance to the
Pentagon's potential role in a H1N1 Vaccination
Program. According to the Institute of Medicine,
quoted by Health Insurance Law Weekly:
"The DoD-Global Emerging Infections System,
through its avian influenza/pandemic influenza
activities at the [DoD] overseas
laboratories and headquarters, has
contributed greatly to the development
of laboratory and communications infrastructures
within partner countries. Beneficial
effects can be seen from current DoD-GEIS
efforts in 56 countries to assist its public
health partners in building capacity through
training and support of laboratory and
communications infrastructures."
Writing in the article, Col. James
Neville, MD, MPH, of the US Air Force School of
Aerospace Medicine, Brooks City-Base, Texas, and
colleagues state, "During seven complete
influenza seasons, the DoD Global
Laboratory-Based Influenza Surveillance
Program...coordinated and expanded
influenza surveillance efforts among the
uniformed services and with DoD partner nations
overseas, and operated in concert with WHO and
CDC programs. As a result, the DoD and other
global communities benefited from improved
surveillance and expanded influenza laboratory
and epidemiologic capability. The
generated data and information supported timely,
informed decision making in response to threats,
expanded the data set used to select the
components for seasonal influenza vaccines, and
provided candidate seed viruses for possible use
in influenza vaccines used worldwide."
In a commentary
in the same issue, Dr. Patrick W. Kelley, MD,
DrPH, of the Institute of Medicine, The National
Academies, notes that, "The somewhat unexpected
emergence of novel H1N1 in
Mexico, rather than in the anticipated Asian
setting, highlights a lesson learned about
the need for comprehensive global
influenza surveillance. This is a lesson that
geographically diverse foreign military
health systems may be well-positioned to help
address."
He
continues, "The success of the US DoD system,
and the particular epidemiologic characteristics
of military
populations and military
health systems, suggest that global influenza
surveillance and response could be more
comprehensive and informative if other military
organizations around the world took advantage of
their comparative organizational advantages to
emulate, extend, and institutionalize the US DoD
approach."
The article
is "Department of Defense Global
Laboratory-Based Influenza Surveillance:
1998-2005" by Angela B Owens, MPH; Linda C
Canas, BS; Kevin L Russell, MD, MTM&H; James
Neville, MD, MPH; Julie A Pavlin, MD, PhD, MPH;
Victor H MacIntosh, MD, MPH; Gregory C Gray, MD,
MPH; and Joel C Gaydos, MD, MPH. The commentary
is "A Commentary on the Military Role
in Global Influenza Surveillance" by Dr. Patrick
W Kelley, MD, DrPH. Both appear in the American
Journal of Preventive Medicine, Volume 37, Issue
3 (September 2009) published by Elsevier.
(Health Insurance Law Weekly, August 2,
2009)
Disclaimer: The views
expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Centre for
Research on Globalization. The contents of this
article are of sole responsibility of the
author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible or liable
for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.
The
CRG grants permission to cross-post original
Global Research articles on community internet
sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright
must be displayed. For publication of Global
Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: mailto:crgeditor@yahoo.com
http://www.globalresearch.ca/www.globalresearch.ca
contains copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material
available to our readers under the provisions of
"fair use" in an effort to advance a better
understanding of political, economic and social
issues. The material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving it for research and
educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair
use" you must request permission from the
copyright owner.